How it works

Upload → verify → certified. Nothing guessed.

AttestAlly doesn't give you another opinion. It checks each claim against an authoritative source of record — deterministically — and shows its work.

Submit your document — any format

PDF, Word, PowerPoint, Excel, OpenDocument or text. Legal brief, financial model, due-diligence memo, investment committee deck, scientific paper, grant application, essay. Word, PowerPoint, Excel and OpenDocument files come back corrected in their original format, with your formatting intact.

We extract every checkable claim

Citations, figures, quotes, statistics, dates, named cases, reported numbers — everything with a verifiable ground truth.

Each claim is verified against an authoritative registry

Case law → CourtListener. Financial figures → SEC EDGAR / XBRL. Medical & scientific → PubMed / ClinicalTrials.gov / Crossref. Deterministic, not a second guess.

Errors corrected, unverifiable claims flagged

Every correction cites its authoritative source. Anything we can't verify is flagged for human review — never silently "fixed."

You receive the certified document + audit trail

The AttestAlly certificate: what was checked, what was verified, what was corrected, what needs review — every item traceable to source.

The honest part is the point. We certify verifiable facts — citations, figures, quotes, data. We do not grade your argument or your prose. What we cannot verify against a source of record, we flag rather than guess. That discipline is exactly why the stamp means something.

Scientists reviewing assay results on laboratory instruments — Claims are checked against the source of record, not against another model.

The same process, a different source of truth

When the fact has no public registry

Steps 2 to 5 are unchanged — we extract every checkable figure, check each one, correct what is wrong and flag what we could not check. Only step 3 differs: instead of an external registry, the figures are checked against the documents you supply — the model, the accounts, the exhibits the report was built from.

You get three lists: figures that agree with your sources, figures that disagree (each quoted against the source row it conflicts with), and figures we could not check, with the reason. The third list is not padding — if we cannot establish that two figures describe the same thing, we leave them alone rather than guess.

This is corroboration against your own records, not verification against an external register of record. A narrower claim, and the certificate says so.

Scope

What we check, and what we don't.

For each citation we confirm that the authority exists, that it is correctly identified (the right case, not merely a real one), and that any quotation is accurate against the opinion’s own text.

We do not judge whether an authority supports the proposition it is cited for. That requires reading the case against the argument, and we will not pretend a deterministic check can do it — your own judgement is still required there. Where we cannot determine something, the certificate says so. It never guesses.

Why it works — the mechanics

Five mechanisms competitors don't have. All patent pending.

Deterministic verification, not another opinionEvery claim is resolved against an external source of record. A pass isn't a model "feeling confident" — it's a match to ground truth.

Model-independent gateWhich model wrote your document — or sits behind our gate — cannot change what the registry says. Model quality can't leak errors past verification. That's an architectural property, not a benchmark result.

Calibrated abstentionWhen coverage is thin, we return "unverified — human review." We never certify what we can't check. No confidently-wrong answers, ever.

A memory that compoundsA fact confirmed against a source of record doesn't need confirming twice. Every document leaves us knowing more of the ground the next one stands on — so this gets faster and better with volume, not slower.

Nothing of yours is keptWe hold your document for at most 24 hours — while you preview it, while we verify it, and briefly afterwards in case you want a re-run — and then it is deleted and cannot be retrieved. We keep a SHA-256 fingerprint so you can prove which document was certified; we do not keep the document. You download or get the certificate emailed when it's done; after that it's deleted too. The system still gets smarter — but only from anonymous, aggregate signal, never your content.

✓

Verify-before-claim — applied to ourselvesWe found and fixed 3 verifier bugs before publishing a single number. A wrong "fabricated" verdict is as unacceptable to us as a wrong citation.

▸

Why this is structural, not a featureNone of the above is a behaviour we coax out of a model with a better prompt — it's what the architecture can and cannot do. A system that emits only what a source of record confirms cannot hand you a confident fabrication. That guarantee doesn't degrade on a hard document, a bad day, or the next model release.

Protected & proven

A verification architecture — patent pending — not a wrapper.

The verify-gate, the model-independent architecture, the compounding memory, and the certificate pipeline are the subject of multiple pending U.S. patent applications. The methodology, benchmark suite, and results are available for review under NDA.

Patent Pending — verify-gate Patent Pending — model-independent inference validation Patent Pending — compounding memory

See it on your document →